The court permitted the appellant to unconditionally withdraw the first appeal due to a compromise between the parties and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
Permission granted to withdraw the first appeal unconditionally; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court FA No.83 of 2011 (12) dt.22-01-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA First Appeal No.83 of 2011 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Smt. Urmila Devi .... .... Appellant/s Versus Sri Ganga Pd. & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MUNGESHWAR SAHOO ORAL ORDER |
|
| 12 | 22-01-2013 Heard the learned counsel Mr. Mani Bhushan Kumar |
| appearing on behalf of the appellant on the interlocutory | |
| application No. 446 of 2013. | |
| This interlocutory application has been filed by the | |
| appellant praying for permission to withdraw this first appeal on | |
| the ground that there has already been compromised between the | |
| parties. Since the prayer has been made to withdraw the appeal | |
| unconditionally the appellant is permitted to withdraw this first appeal. Accordingly, this first appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. |
(Mungeshwar Sahoo, J)
S.S./-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether permission can be granted for unconditional withdrawal of a first appeal due to compromise between parties.
Smt. Urmila Devi
Sri Ganga Pd. & Ors
Mungeshwar Sahoo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
