This oral order records that the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the writ application on the ground of it becoming infructuous; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.99 of 2007 (3) dt.25-02-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.99 of 2007
====================================================== M/s. Bhawani Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The Central Coal Fields Ltd. & Anr. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. D. Choudhary, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA ORAL ORDER 3 25-02-2013 Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the writ application stating that it has become infructuous. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
spal/-
M/s. Bhawani Coke Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Central Coal Fields Ltd. & Anr.
Ramesh Kumar Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
