Petitioners sought to withdraw their writ application as their main grievance was redressed. The High Court permitted the withdrawal and dismissed the application on that basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20788 of 2012
======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.20788 of 2012 (8) dt.17-09-2013
2 / 4
Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20788 of 2012 (8) dt.17-09-2013
3 / 4
| .... .... Respondent/s | |
|---|---|
| =================== | =================================== |
| Appearance : | |
| For the Petitioner/s : |
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar Mangalam & Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan |
| For the Patna Municipal: | M/s. H.S. Himkar & |
| Corporation | Mr. Bishwa Bibhuti Kr. Singh |
| For the State : =================== |
Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath AAG-3 & Mr. Saptashwa Singh, AC to AAG 3 =================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABLE | MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA |
Patna High Court CWJC No.20788 of 2012 (8) dt.17-09-2013
4 / 4
ORAL ORDER
8 17-09-2013
Mr. S.B.K.Mangalam, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ application stating that the main grievance of the petitioners has, in the meantime, been redressed. The writ application is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
S.Pandey/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
Vinay Kumar Pappu
Kismati Devi
Meena Kumari
Arjun Kumar Yadav
Seema Verma
Shyam Babu Yadav
Ramesh Kumar Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
