M. Tripathi, J. dismissed a writ application seeking annulment of a registered sale deed, ruling the writ is misplaced and directing the petitioner to approach the civil court.
Writ application dismissed; petitioner directed to invoke civil court jurisdiction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.17960 of 2008 (8) dt.18-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17960 of 2008
| ====================================================== Narendra Kumar, son of late Ram Nomi Singh, at present residing at Town Madhepura, Police Station–Madhepura, District-Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & others .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurjati K.Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr. (SC6) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER |
|
| 8 | 18-07-2013 Since learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to |
| produce any authority of any court that a registered sale deed can be annulled by the High Court exercising its writ jurisdiction, there will be difficulty for this Court to entertain the present writ application for such a prayer. |
|
| Writ is misplaced. It is dismissed. Let the petitioner invoke the jurisdiction of the civil court if he so desires. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) |
R.K.Pathak/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can annul a registered sale deed under its writ jurisdiction.
Narendra Kumar
State of Bihar
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
