Disposed

Deochandra Sah @ Jaichandra Sah v. Srimati Manju Lata Mishra

Patna HC16 Sept 2013CWJC/16572/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this civil writ jurisdiction case, the High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the application under Article 226 seeking to set aside an eviction-related order, recording the liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

The application was permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order.

Deochandra Sah @ Jaichandra Sah Vs Srimati Manju Lata Mishra — Landlord and Tenant | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16572 of 2013

¶2

====================================================== 1. Deochandra Sah @ Jaichandra Sah Son Of Late Binda Sah Resident Of Village - Digghikala Station Road, Via - Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali

¶3

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Srimati Manju Lata Mishra Wife Of Sri Kumod Pd. Singh Resident Of Village - Digghikala, Kumud Nagar, P.O. Digghikala, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali 2. Kumud Pd. Singh Son Of Late Kari Singh Resident Of Village - Digghikala, Kumud Nagar, P.O. Digghikala, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali 3. Srimati Punam Sinha Wife Of Sri Mithilesh Pandit Resident Of Patna Diesel, Station Road, Hajipur, P.O. Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali 4. Munna Pandit Son Of Sri Madan Pandit @ Madan Mohan Pandit Resident Of Patna Diesel, Station Road, Hajipur, P.O. Hajipur, P.S. Hajipur Sadar, District - Vaishali

¶4

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Birju Prasad For the Respondents . ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶5

2 16-09-2013 This application, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has been filed for setting aside the order dated 20.05.2013 passed in Misc. Case No. 10/10 by learned Munsif-I, Vaishali, Hajipur arising out of Eviction Suit No. 5/2005 whereby learned Executing Court has rejected the petitioner’s application filed under Order 21 Rule 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

¶6

Learned counsel for the petitioner, in view of the

¶7

Patna High Court CWJC No.16572 of 2013 (2) dt.16-09-2013

¶8

2/2

¶9

provisions contained in Order 21 Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeks permission to withdraw this application with a liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order dated 20.05.2013 passed in Misc. Case No. 10/10.

¶10

This application is permitted to be withdrawn with

¶11

the liberty as aforesaid.

¶12

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J)

¶13

BKS/-

Deochandra Sah @ Jaichandra Sah v. Srimati Manju Lata Mishra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deochandra Sah @ Jaichandra Sah v. Srimati Manju Lata Mishra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sachidanand Panday Vs Sheo Shankar Pandey and Anr.

Rakhi Sinha @ Rakhi and Anr. Vs Kamal Kishore Sinha @ Kamal Ki

Nishit Kumar Singh @ Nishant K Vs Ramanand Prasad Gupta and Ors.

Sheo Mangal Singh @ Sheo Manga Vs Munia Devi and Ors.

Mahadeo Mahto and Ors. Vs Sunita Devi and Ors.

Shakeena Devi Vs Mostt. Kamlawati Devi and Anr.