Chandan Chakraborty v. Calcutta State Transport Corpn
Case brief
What is this about?
An application for withdrawal of a writ petition was permitted. The High Court dismissed the application as it was no longer pressed by the counsel.
An application for withdrawal of a writ petition was permitted. The High Court dismissed the application as it was no longer pressed by the counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15252 of 2006 (5) dt.25-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15252 of 2006
====================================================== Chandan Chakraborty S/o late Dhirendra Kumar Chakrborty, R/o 1/1/31/, Dum Dum Road, P.S.-Sinthee, Kolkata-700002 .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. Calcutta State Transport Corporation, though its Chairman & Managing Director, having permanent Office at 5, Nilgunge Road, Belghoria, Kolkata-700056 2. The Managing Director, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 45, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700013 3. The Deputy Managing Director, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 45, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700013 4. The Chief Accounts Officer-cum-Financial Advisor, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 5, Nilgunge Road, Belghoria, Kolkata-700056 5. The Senior Law Officer, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 45, Ganesh Chandra Avenue, Kolkata-700013 6. The Depot Manager Paik Para Depot, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 3/2, Rani Devendra Bala Road, Kolkata-700002 7. The Assistant Personnel Officer, Paik Para Depot, Calcutta State Transport Corporation, 3/2, Rani Devendra Bala Road, Kolkata-700002 ---------------------------------------------------------------Respondent 1st Set. 8. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary .... .... Respondent 2nd Set. ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, Advocate Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar D. P. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 5 25-04-2013 Mr. Niraj Kumar, learned counsel, on instruction of Mr. Dhruba Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, states that he has no instruction to press this application. Therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded. This application stands dismissed as not pressed.
RPS/- (Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
Chandan Chakraborty
Calcutta State Transport Corporation
State of Bihar
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court