Petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner; counter affidavit had already been filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13842 of 2008
====================================================== Man.Comm.Of Madrasa Quasimul O .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Sinha Mr. Deepak Kumar Singh Mr. S.M.Shabbir Alam Mr. Abdul Aziz For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga7) Mr. Md.Rashid Alam
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
4 16-07-2013 The matter was passed over Yesterday in absence of counsel for the petitioners. Even today, none appears to represent the petitioners. Counter affidavit on behalf of Madarsa Education Board has already been filed. Learned counsel for the State is present. The writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
Sudha/-
Patna High Court CWJC No.13842 of 2008 (4) dt.16-07-2013
2 / 2
Man.Comm.Of Madrasa Quasimul O
The State Of Bihar
AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
