Petitioner filed a writ claiming the writ application became infructuous as grievances were redressed, leading the court to dismiss the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13117 of 2010
====================================================== Amarnath Kumar Rai S/O Late Ramprasad Rai R/O Vill.Bindganwa, P.S.- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur
.... .... Petitioner Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok K. Karna, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ratnakar Jha, AC to G.P. XVII
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN
ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.13117 of 2010 (2) dt.08-01-2013
2 / 2
pressed. .
As a result, this writ petition is dismissed as not
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
Spd/-
Amarnath Kumar Rai
The State Of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
