Bhikhari Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ application deemed infructuous; the court granted permission, resulting in dismissal by withdrawal.
Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a writ application deemed infructuous; the court granted permission, resulting in dismissal by withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10594 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
1. Bhikhari Paswan, 2. Sukhari Paswan, Both are sons of Panchu Paswan, resident of Village and P.O. Bhagwatipur (Amghatta) P.S. Dumra District Samastipur .... .... Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate, District Sitamarhi. 3. The Circle Officer, Dumra, District Sitamarhi .... .... Respondents |
|
| ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Avinash Kumar, AC to GA 6 ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 17-06-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this writ |
| application has become infructuous. Hence he seeks permission to withdraw the application. |
|
| Permission is granted. This application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| B.T/- | (Jayanandan Singh, J) |
Bhikhari Paswan
Sukhari Paswan
State of Bihar
District Magistrate, District Sitamarhi
Circle Officer, Dumra
Jayanandan Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court