Petitioner secured bail in an arms recovery case, furnishing a bond with specific conditions regarding sureties and undertakings to prevent misuse and ensure trial appearance.
Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 5,000 and two sureties, one being a close relative and the other his brother-in-law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.996 of 2013
====================================================== Ali Hasan Ansari @ Majjali Ansari @ Ali Hasan Mian, son of late Ramjan Mian, resident of Daraol, P.S. Matiyaria, Distt. West Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Suresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashok Kr. Gupta, Adv. For the State : Mr. B.N.P. Sinha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
2 16-01-2013
Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the
offence under Sections 25(1-b)A and 26 of the Arms Act.
Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since
11.9.2012 for recovery of Arms and he has no criminal antecedents, let the Petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, in connection with Matiyaria P.S. Case No. 19 of 2012 subject to the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner and the other shall be the brother-in-law (Sala) of the Petitioner namely, Sukhal Ansari. The bailor will also undertake to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.996 of 2013 (2) dt.16-01-2013
2/2
inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is, he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
S.Ali
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Petitioner should be released on bail in a case involving recovery of arms under Sections 25(1-b)A and 26 of the Arms Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ali Hasan Ansari
The State of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
