Dewanti Devi and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Court treated application as infructuous due to arrest of petitioners and disposed of the matter in an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.50722 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Dewanti Devi wife of Gayanand Vishwakarma @ Dayanand Vishwakarma 2. Gayanand Vishwakarma @ Dayanand Vishwakarma, son of Late Harvansh Vishwakarma .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 08-01-2013 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners have been arrested, hence the application has become infructuous. Accordingly the same is disposed off. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/-
Dewanti Devi @ Dayanand Vishwakarma
Gayanand Vishwakarma @ Dayanand Vishwakarma
The State Of Bihar
DINESH KUMAR SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court