Single judge order refusing the petitioner's bail bail application驳回后指示迅速审判。
Bail prayer rejected; Trial Court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38383 of 2013 (2) dt.25-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 38383 of 2013
=================================================== Raja @ Washimuddin, Son of Md. Nasimuddin. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02. 25.09.2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in Sakra P.S. Case No. 378 of 2012 (S.Tr. No. 276/2013) instituted for the offences under Sections 394 and 411 IPC.
Considering that it is only recently the Petitioner was refused bail on 08.04.2013 I see no reason to review the earlier order refusing bail to the Petitioner. The prayer for bail is once again rejected.
The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for bail should be allowed reconsidering the recent refusal.
Whether the trial should be expedited.
Raja @ Washimuddin
The State of Bihar
ANJANA PRAKASH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
