The Patna High Court rejected a bail application of the petitioner, who was directly alleged to have committed rape. The court directed the trial court to expedite the trial on a day-to-day basis.
Prayer for bail rejected; Trial Court directed to expedite trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3566 of 2013 (3) dt.01-04-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3566 of 2013 ====================================================== 1. Hira Prasad Mahto @ Kailu Mahto S/O Phuleshwar Mahto, R/O VillKalwara, P.S.-Hathauri, Distt-Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 3/ 01-04-2013 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section(s) 376/34 Indian Penal Code. Considering that there is direct allegation against the Petitioner of having committed rape upon the prosecutrix, I am not inclined to grant bail to him. His prayer for bail is rejected. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and hold it on day to day basis in view of the direction of the Hon’ble Apex Court.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
JA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to an accused directly charged with rape.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Hira Prasad Mahto
The State Of Bihar
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
