Allowed

Mahindra Ram @ Mahendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Feb 2013CR. MISC./2549/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case involving serious offences under the IPC and Arms Act. The court emphasized the lack of specific overt acts against him and his fair antecedents, releasing him on a Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties subject to several stringent conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Mahindra Ram @ Mahendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 2549 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Mahindra Ram @ Mahendra Ram, S/o Saryug Ram @ Sarju Ram. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar

¶3

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶4

.... .... Opposite Party/s

¶5

=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶6

01.02.2013

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶8

State.

¶9

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶10

Considering that there is no specific overt act alleged against the Petitioner who has fair antecedents, let him be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No. 160 of 2012 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2549 of 2013 (2) dt.01-02-2013

¶12

¶13

Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶14

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶15

Vikash/-

Mahindra Ram @ Mahendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahindra Ram @ Mahendra Ram v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhurfekan Bind @ Ghurbigan Bind Vs The State Of Bihar

Yasoda Devi and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandrika Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Saimtullah @ Samiullah @ Md. Saimtullah Vs The State Of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Mandal @ Sahil Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar