The Patna High Court allowed the withdrawal of a withdrawn Criminal Miscellaneous application and dismissed it accordingly in an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25453 of 2011 (2) dt.16-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25453 of 2011
| ====================================================== 1. Satya Narain Giri 2. Sheo Narain Giri 3. Dilip Giri 4. Supan Giri @ Jai Prakash Giri 5. Awadhesh Giri .... .... Petitioners Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Appearance: For the Petitioners : M/s Veena Kumari Jaiswal and Chandra Kala Jaiswal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. APP ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 2 | 16-08-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to |
| withdraw this application. The prayer is allowed and this application is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| (Mandhata Singh, J) |
A.I./-
Satya Narain Giri
Sheo Narain Giri
Dilip Giri
Supan Giri
Awadhesh Giri
The State Of Bihar
Mandhata Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
