Petitioner sought permission to withdraw application with liberty to raise points later. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24523 of 2008 (4) dt.23-09-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.24523 of 2008
====================================================== Sheo Kumar Saw, son of late Rangi Saw, resident of village-Juraih, P.O.Ugma, P.S.-Madanpur, District-Aurangabad, Bihar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar, 2. The Commissioner, Magadh Range, Gaya, 3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad, & 4. The Block Development Officer, Navinagar, Aurangabad. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 4/ 23-09-2013 Learned counsel for the Petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to raise all these points at the stage of framing of Charge.
The application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
JA/-
Sheo Kumar Saw
The State of Bihar
The Commissioner, Magadh Range, Gaya
The District Magistrate, Aurangabad
The Block Development Officer, Navinagar, Aurangabad
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
