Petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel. The application was dismissed for non-prosecution despite the State's counsel being present.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22707 of 2011 (04) dt.22-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22707 of 2011
====================================================== Ram Ji Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Anr. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANDHATA SINGH ORAL ORDER 04 22-08-2013 On repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel for the State is present. Accordingly, this application is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Mandhata Singh, J) Vikash/-
Ram Ji Singh
The State Of Bihar
MANDHATA SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
