Allowed

Md. Shahid @ Majnu @ Md. Majahidur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Apr 2013CR. MISC./10211/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Cr. Misc. No. 10211 of 2013, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a criminal accused under various IPC offences, citing a pending title suit between parties. The order imposed strict conditions regarding sureties, address updates, and court appearances.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing Rs. 5,000 bond with two sureties of similar amount under strict conditions.

Md. Shahid @ Majnu @ Md. Majahidur Rahman Vs The… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2013)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No. 10211 of 2013

¶2

=================================================== Md. Shahid @ Majnu @ Md. Majahidur Rahman S/o Hasi R/o Village-Poria Sonapur, P.S.-Simraha, Distt.-Araria at Present R/o Village-Rajkhar, P.S.-Araria, P.O.-Araria, Distt.-Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER

¶3

11.04.2013

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

¶5

State.

¶6

The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 452, 427, 380, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Considering that there is a Title Suit pending between the parties, let the Petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/(Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Araria R.S. P.S. Case No. 449 of 2012 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10211 of 2013 (2) dt.11-04-2013

¶9

¶10

the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶11

(Anjana Prakash, J.)

¶12

Vikash/-

Md. Shahid @ Majnu @ Md. Majahidur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shahid @ Majnu @ Md. Majahidur Rahman v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Giri Vs The State Of Bihar

Aman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Ajay Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Bir Bahadur Rai Vs The State Of Bihar