The State Of Bihar and Anr. v. Raghu Banshi Pd. and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order addressed two interlocutory applications and a Letters Patent Appeal regarding costs. The court disposed of the interim applications and rejected the appeal against the cost order as not maintainable.
What did the court decide?
The appeal against the order of cost was rejected as not maintainable. The interlocutory applications were disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1705 of 2012
In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10533 of 2010 With Interlocutory Application No. 7180 of 2012 And Interlocutory Application No. 7181 of 2012 In Letters Patent Appeal No.1705 of 2012
====================================================== 1. The State of Bihar.
- Director in Chief, Provident Fund (Finance Department), Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
.... Respondents.... Appellants
Versus
- Raghu Banshi Prasad S/O Late Roshan Prasad, Resident of Shahi Colony, P.O.- Hajipur, P.S.- Hajipur Town, District- Vaishali.
………Petitioner………..Respondent 2. The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
- The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.
.... Respondents.... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Lakmesh Marvind, AC to SC-9 For the Respondent/s : ---------
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an appeal against an order imposing costs is maintainable under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.
Whether the delay in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
The State of Bihar
- appellant
Director in Chief, Provident Fund
- respondent
Raghu Banshi Prasad
- respondent
The Principal Secretary, Personnel and Administrative Department
- respondent
The Accountant General, Bihar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court