This oral order dismisses an appeal by Madan Mohan Tiwari as withdrawn. The appellant sought leave to withdraw an application for restructuring interest amounts with banks, claiming these commercial matters should remain within the bank's discretion.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court LPA No.167 of 2013 (2) dt.12-02-2013
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.167 of 2013 ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Madan Mohan Tiwari .... .... Appellant/s Versus The Union Of India & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
|
| Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. |
|
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA) |
|
| 2 12 |
-02-2013 After some argument leave is sought to withdraw the application for pursuing remedies before the Bank for restructuring of the interest amount. Those are commercial matters which have to be left to the discretion of the Bank which essentially deals with public money. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. |
| (Navin Sinha, J) | |
| K.C.jha/- | (Shivaji Pandey, J) |
Madan Mohan Tiwari
The Union Of India & Ors
Navin Sinha
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
