The High Court at Patna dismissed a review application filed by the appellant against an earlier judgment in Letters Patent Appeal No. 931 of 2011, finding no ground for review established.
Application for review dismissed in limine; no hearing allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.294 of 2011 In
Letters Patent Appeal No. 931 of 2011
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13550 of 2010
====================================================== Sunaina Devi, wife of Sri Nemu Mallik, resident of Village- Sahdeo Bujurg, P.S. Desri, District Vaishali
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shiv Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s :
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
4 19-09-2012 This Application for review has been filed by the appellant for review of our judgment and order dated 30th June 2011/ 1st July 2011 passed in Letters Patent Appeal No. 931 of 2011 arising out of CWJC No. 13550 of 2010.
Under the guise of review the appellant seeks rehearing of the Letters Patent Appeal.
No ground for review is made out.
The application is dismissed in limine.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
BTiwary/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review application should be allowed to obtain a rehearing of the Letters Patent Appeal in the absence of any ground for review.
Sunaina Devi
The State Of Bihar
R.M. Doshit
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
