In a miscellaneous jurisdiction case under Article 226, the Patna High Court directed the Divisional Commissioner to dispose of a pending review petition by ignoring a prior order on merits, subsequently dismissing the current application.
The Commissioner directed to decide the review petition ignoring his earlier order on merit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6110 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajiv Kumar Singh Gp2
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA
VERMA
ORAL ORDER
This M.J.C. application stands disposed of. .
(Prakash Chandra Verma, J)
M.Rahman/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Commissioner should decide the pending review petition ignoring his earlier order on merit.
Bibha Kumari W/O Sri Arun Kumar Akela
The State Of Bihar
The Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Government Of Bihar
The Director Integrated Child Development Scheme
The Divisional Commissioner, Purnia Division
The District Magistrate, Purnia
Prakasha Chandra Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
