The court recalled a previous order and dismissed the writ petition as premature due to vague allegations, granting liberty to file a fresh petition after condoning any delay.
The writ petition was dismissed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.3742 of 2012 (2) dt.21-11-2012
| IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3742 of 2012 ====================================================== |
|---|
| Damodar Ray .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== |
| Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kaushal Kishor For the Respondent/s : Mr. Devendra Kr Sinha AAG- 2 |
| ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA ORAL ORDER |
| 2 21-11-2012 Order dated 05.07.2012 passed in CWJC No. 8940 of 2012 is recalled. Allegations made in the writ petition are vague, therefore, it is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh writ petition. Delay, if any, shall be condoned. |
| Bhardwaj/- (Prakash Chandra Verma, J) |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition alleging vague allegations is maintainable or must be dismissed.
Damodar Ray
The State Of Bihar
Prakash Chandra Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
