In the present appeal only question has been raised that the notional income i.e. Rs. 15,000/- was incorporated in Schedule II of the M.V. Act long back in the year 1994 and thereafter the Apex Court in a case reported in (2008) 12 SCC 165 (LAXMI DEVI AND OTHERS Versus MOHAMMAD TABBAR AND ANOTHER) has already indicated that in such cases income should be taken into account as at least Rs. 30,000/- per annum. This proposition of law has not been disputed by learned counsel for respondent / Insurance Co. Accordingly, the court is of the opinion that the appeal can be allowed directing to calculate the loss treating notional income as Rs. 30,000/- per annum and as such multiplying Rs. 30,000/with 13 since the appellant at the relevant time was 50 years old the compensation amount comes to Rs. 3,90,000/- (Rs. 30,000/- x 13 = Rs. 3,90,000/-). The order of the Tribunal in respect of Rs. 15,000/- for treatment and Rs. 5,000/- for pain and suffering requires no interference and as such the compensation amount comes to Rs. 4,10,000/- (Rs. 3,90,000/- + Rs. 15,000/- + Rs. 5,000/- = Rs. 4,10,000/-). The respondent no. 1 / insurer of the offending vehicle is required to pay the compensation amount after deducting all the amount which has already been paid to the
