Oral order disposing a writ petition where the court advised the petitioner to object to a specific notice before the competent authority under the law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21787 of 2012
====================================================== Bhuneshwar Thakur, aged about 58 years, son of Late Ram Ekbal Thakur, resident of village – Bagnagari, in the Panchayat of Gorigawandih, P.O. + P.S. – Saraiya, District - Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 2. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur 3. The Block Development Officer, Saraiya, Muzaffarpur 4. The Gram Panchayat, Gorigawandih, under Block – Saraiya, through its Secretary at the Panchayat Bhawan in the village – Gorigawandih, Block – Saraiya, P.O. & P.S. – Saraiya, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 03-12-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. Petitioner appears to be aggrieved by the notice annexed with letter No. 740 dated 24.3.2012, Annexure-2 which contains the name of his father and others, who died as far back on 7.11.2008. 3. Petitioner should be well advised to take objection to the impugned notice before the competent authority, which should be dealt with in accordance with law.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
Arjun/-
Bhuneshwar Thakur
The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar
The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur
The Block Development Officer, Saraiya
The Gram Panchayat, Gorigawandih
V.N. Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
