Single judge disposed of the writ petition by directing respondent No.3 to decide the petitioner's representation within one month of receiving the certified copy of the order.
Direction to respondent No.3 to decide the representation within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19064 of 2011
======================================================
Jagdish Prasad Yadav
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Udai Shankar Singh
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Balak Mahto Ag
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA VERMA ORAL ORDER
3 10-10-2012 Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction that respondent No.3 shall decide the representation of the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt/production of a certified copy of this order.
(Prakash Chandra Verma, J)
Mkr./-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents are directed to decide the petitioner's representation within one month?
Jagdish Prasad Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Prakash Chandra Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
