Disposed

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC26 Sept 2012CWJC/17989/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged the selection of respondent no.8 in an L-1 category. Due to pending internal complaint, this writ application was disposed of with direction to Corporation authorities to consider the objection promptly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to concerned authorities of the Corporation to consider the petitioner's objection, take a decision, and communicate it as early as possible.

Sanjeev Kumar Vs The Union Of India and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17989 of 2012

¶3

====================================================== Sanjeev Kumar, son of Sri Suresh Prasad Yadav, resident of At and P.O.Bakhadda, P.S.-Sahpur Kamal, District-Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

1. The Union Of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

¶6

1. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its General Manager, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., office at State of Bihar, Loknayak Jaiprarkash Bhawan, 5^th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna-800001.

¶7

1. The Dy. General Manager (Marketing), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., office at State of Bihar, Loknayak Jaiprarkash Bhawan, 5^th Floor, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna-800001.

¶8

1. The Sr.Divisional Retail Sales Manager, Begusarai Division Office, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (Marketing Division), P.O.-Barauni Oil Refinery, District-Begusarai-851114.

¶9

1. Interview Board through its member Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Dealers Selection Committees, Patna.

¶10

1. Sales Officer, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Sale Office, Begusarai. 7. Members of the Interview Committee, I.O.C. Retail Outlet Selection Committee, Patna.

¶11

1. Smt. Zeenat Afshan, Wife of CH. Firoze Abbas, R/o Village and P.O.Lakhminia, P.S.-Balia, District-Begusarai..... .... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. N. A. Shamsi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 26-09-2012 Petitioner’s grievance is in respect of selection of respondent no.8 as the first in L-1 category.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already filed his complaint in this regard before the authorities of the Corporation, vide Annexure-6 and 6/1 which has not been disposed of as yet.

¶15

In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.17989 of 2012 (2) dt.26-09-2012

¶17

2 / 2

¶18

with a direction to the concerned authorities of the Corporation to consider the objection of the petitioner, take a decision and communicate it to the petitioner as early as possible.

¶19

Arvind/-

¶20

(Jayanandan Singh, J)

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Kumar v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sheo Kumar Sah Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Janki Construction Pltd. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Usha Devi Vs The Central Bank Of India and Ors.

Ram Bahadur Pd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md.Meraj and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Gautam Prasad Vs Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank