Krishna Niketan v. the State of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1650 of 1998
====================================================== Krishna Niketan, 43 Patliputra Colony, Patna through its Principal Mrs. Madhu Mita Nag. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Transport Commissioner, Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. District Transport Officer, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Yogendra Mishra, Mr. Uma Kant Tiwary, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Ray Shivaji Nath, AAG 3. Mr. Shambhu Nath, A.C. to AAG 3. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5 31-08-2012 Learned Advocate Mr. Yogendra Mishra appears for the petitioner. He states that in view of passage of time this petition has become infructuous. He, therefore, seeks leave to withdraw this petition. Leave is granted. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(R.M. Doshit, CJ)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Sujit/-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Krishna Niketan
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
R.M. Doshit
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court