Dismissed

M/s Ramji Mistri Saw Mill and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC6 Sept 2012CWJC/16397/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, proprietors of saw mills, approached the High Court via writ regarding an impugned order. The court noted agreement on availability of alternative remedy by way of appeal and dismissed the writ, granting liberty to file the appeal with stay on coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Writ application disposed of with liberty to file an appeal within one month; no coercive action during pendency.

M/s Ramji Mistri Saw Mill and Ors. Vs The State Of… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2012)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16397 of 2012

¶3

======================================================

¶4

M/S Ramji Mistri Saw Mill, Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor Ramji Mistri, son of Sri Ram Ekbal Mistri, resident of Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal.

¶5

M/S Vishwakrma Saw Mill, Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor Sriram Mistri, son of Sri Ram Swaroop Mistri, resident of Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal.

¶6

M/S Laxmi Saw Mill, Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor Balmiki Mistri, son of late Ram Baran Mistri, resident of Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal.

¶7

M/S Radheshyam Saw Mill, Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal, a proprietorship firm through its Proprietor Radheshyam Mistri, son of Sri Arjun, resident of Kurtha, P.S.-Kurtha, District-Arwal.

¶8

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Environment and Forest Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, 4^th Floor, Technology Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

¶11

The Commissioner-cum-Chairman, Selection Committee of Saw Mills, Magadh Division, Gaya.

¶12

The Conservator of Forest, Gaya Circle, Gaya, Karimganj, Gaya.

¶13

The Divisional Forest Officer, Aurangabad Forest Division, Aurangabad.

¶14

.... .... Respondent/s

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Mistry

¶17

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Avnish Nandan Sinha Gp11

¶18

======================================================

¶19

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANANDAN SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.16397 of 2012 (2) dt.06-09-2012

¶21

2 / 2

¶22

2 06-09-2012

¶23

Learned counsels for the parties agree that against the impugned order, as contained in Annexure-6, petitioners have alternative remedy by way of appeal under the law.

¶24

In the circumstances, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file their appeal before the Appellate Authority. If petitioners file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within one month, no coercive action shall be taken against them till their appeal is decided.

¶25

Arvind/-

¶26

(Jayanandan Singh, J)

M/s Ramji Mistri Saw Mill and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Ramji Mistri Saw Mill and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Panagarh Engineering Works Vs The North Eastern Railway and Ors.

Binay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramjit Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary Environment and Forest Department, and Ors.

Prasant Kumar Vs The National Insurance Company and Ors.

Prashant Kumar Jha Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Nawal Kishore Pd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.