Petitioners sought quashing of FIR under Sections 419, 420 IPC and Section 34 IPC. The Court held allegations constituted a cognizable offence and dismissed the writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed; prayer to quash the FIR dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ No.146 of 2012
The petitioners have been made accused in Begusarai Town P.S. Case No. 367 of 2011 dated 1.10.2011 registered under
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.146 of 2012 (3) dt.21-01-2013
2 / 2
Sections 419 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Their prayer is to quash the FIR of the aforesaid case.
The allegations made in the FIR do constitute a cognizable offence. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in the present case.
The writ petition is dismissed, accordingly.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Sanjeet/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the allegations in the FIR constitute a cognizable offence warranting dismissal of the petition to quash it.
Sanjay Kumar S/O Ramchandra Poddar
Sawan Kumar
Shivanand Jha
Om Prakash
Sanjay Kumar S/O Yugal Kishore Singh
Saligram Sah
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
