Criminal miscellaneous application filed by an acquitted petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn after permission to withdraw was granted.
Permission to withdraw the application was granted; the application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27784 of 2010
===================================================== Vindhyachal Sharma @ Bindhyachal Sharma, son of Raghubansh Singh, resident of village-Berra, P.S. Masaurhi, District-Patna, at present KCT Havaldar, B.M.P.-03, Bodh Gaya. .... .... Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party. ===================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mrs. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ===================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER --------------
3 04-12-2012 While submitting that the petitioner has been acquitted of the charge, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for permission to withdraw this application.
Permission is accorded.
This application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J)
P.S./-
Vindhyachal Sharma @ Bindhyachal Sharma
The State of Bihar
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
