On 3 December 2012, this Court quashed Criminal Complaint Case No.3313-C of 2007 after counsel submitted that parties had compromised and the petitioner had made good the alleged loss.
Quashing of Complaint Case No.3313-C of 2007 pending before Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2197 of 2012 (7) dt.03-12-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2197 of 2012
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
7/ 03-12-2012 Counsel for the Petitioners files Supplementary
Affidavit brining on record the factum of compromise and that they have made good the loss allegedly caused to the Complainant.
Both the parties agree that now the dispute has been sorted out between them.
In view of such, entire proceeding of Complaint Case No.3313-C of 2007 pending before Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Patna, is hereby quashed.
The application stands allowed.
(Anjana Prakash, J)
JA/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint case proceedings should be quashed upon compromise and repayment of loss.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shailesh Kumar Singh and others
The State of Bihar and others
Ajna Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
