Single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition by holding that a writ proceeding is not an appropriate forum for an inter-se family dispute citing A.I.R. 1993 SC 1225.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.925 of 2010
Versus
----------29.08.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly acknowledges that the grievance stands
substantially redressed from the counter affidavit.
The Court finds from the pleadings that the subject matter of the writ petition is primarily a civil claim with regard to an inter se family dispute for which a writ proceeding is not the appropriate forum as held in A.I.R. 1993 SC 1225.
The writ application stands disposed.
P. Kumar
( Navin Sinha, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ proceeding is an appropriate forum for an inter-se family dispute.
Whether the grievance remains outstanding after partial redressal in counter affidavit.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
A.I.R. 1993 SC 1225Followed¶17
Manjula Kumari
The State Of Bihar
Navin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
