The High Court disposed of four writ applications (CWJC Nos. 984, 985, 1458, and 1626 of 2011) in similar terms as a prior order (CWJC No. 13973 of 2009), following counsel's agreement that the notice in question was covered by the previous judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No.984 of 2011 SRI AJAY KUMAR . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.985 of 2011 SRI SURENDRA SINGH . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.1458 of 2011 ASHOK PASWAN . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . with CWJC No.1626 of 2011 AKALU MANJHI . Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS . ----------- 2. 18.03.2011 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State. Learned Counsel for the parties are agreed that the notice dated 14.8.2010 issued to the petitioners by the Sub Divisional Officer, Nawadah Sadar is covered by the orders of this Curt in CWJC No. 13973 of 2009 and that these writ applications may be disposed off in similar terms with similar directions.
These writ applications stand disposed in like terms as CWJC No. 13973 of 2009.
Snkumar/-
(Navin Sinha,J.)
SRI AJAY KUMAR
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
SRI SURENDRA SINGH
ASHOK PASWAN
AKALU MANJHI
Navin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
