The High Court of Patna, in four consolidated writ applications, dismissed the petitions as withdrawn by the counsel for the petitioners on the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.1213 of 2010
HARI LAL TATMA
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
with
CWJC No.1291 of 2010
BHAGWAN LAL SINGH
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
with
CWJC No.1468 of 2010
SULTAN YADAV
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
with
CWJC No.1546 of 2010
AFZAL HUSSAIN
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
2. 28.03.2011
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, learned Counsel for the
petitioners prays for leave to withdraw these applications. These writ applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)
Hari Lal Tatma
Bhagwan Lal Singh
Sultan Yadav
Afzal Hussain
The State of Bihar
Navin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court