Disposed

Radha Kumari and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC26 Nov 2010CWJC/6896/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order disposed of the writ application without detailed reasoning, remitting representation regarding the termination of appointments and consideration of a Madhyama qualification holder to be decided in accordance with a prior Court order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Representation to be considered and disposed off in accordance with law and the order of this Court within four weeks.

Radha Kumari and Anr. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2010)

¶1

 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

 CWJC No.6896 of 2010

¶3

1. RADHA KUMARI, W/O DOMAN SINGH, R/O VILLAGE-TILAKPURA TOLA GAGAN BIGHA,P.O.-SIHADI,BLOCK-HASPURA,DISTRICT-AURANGABAD (BIHAR).

¶4

2. CHANCHALA KUMARI, D/O SIDHNATH SINGH, R/O VILLAGE+POSTDUMARA,BLOCK-HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (BIHAR)

¶5

 Versus

¶6

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR,PATNA.

¶7

2. DIRECTOR,PANCHAYATI RAJ DEPARTMENT,GOVT. OF BIHAR.

¶8

3. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, AURANGABAD,BIHAR.

¶9

4. DISTRICT PANCHAYAT RAJ OFFICER,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD.

¶10

5. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER, AURANGABAD, DISTRICT- AURANGABAD.

¶11

6. BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD.

¶12

7. SERPANCH,SONHATHU,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD.

¶13

8. THE SERPANCH,DUMARA,HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD.

¶14

9. BIMALA KUMARI, W/O AMARESH SHARMA, R/O VILLAGE-TILAKPURA,P.O.ANGRAHI,BLOCK+P.S.- HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (ILLEGALLY APPOINTED AT THE POST OF PETITIONER NO.1 RADHA KUMARI)

¶15

10. ASHA (DEVI) KUMARI, W/O RABINDRA PRASAD AKELA, R/O VILLAGE-DUMARO
TOLA JAMAL BIGHA,BLOCK+P.S.- HASPURA,DISTRICT- AURANGABAD (ILLEGALLY
APPOINTED AT THE POST OF PETITIONER NO.2 CHANCHALA KUMARI.

¶16

 -----------
 For the Petitioners: M/s P.L.Jaiswal, Ranjit Kumar and
Ranvijay Kumar Sharma, Advocates
 For the Respondents: Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to SC 7.

¶17

-------

¶18

26.11.2010 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Counsel for the State.

¶19

The matter relates to termination of Sachiv, Gram Kuthery, appointed on the basis of Matriculate qualification, termination of such appointment and consideration of a Madhyama qualification holder made equivalent by a subsequent legislative amendment.

¶20

This question has been considered in detail by this Court in CWJC No. 4494 of 2010 disposed on .

¶21

The petitioners are stated to have represented. Let the representation be considered and disposed off in accordance with law and the order of this Court as aforesaid preferably within a maximum period of four weeks from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order after hearing all concerned including Respondent no. 10.

¶22

The writ application stands disposed.

¶23

Snkumar/- (Navin Sinha,J.)

Radha Kumari and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radha Kumari and Anr. v. the State of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

A.S.I. Ram Kumar Das Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Vijay Kumar Mishra Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Niraj Kumar and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Nishant Gaurav and Ors. Vs the State of Bihar Ors.