The writ petitioner sought disposal of a representation without arguing on merits. The court disposed of the matter by directing the respondent to decide the representation within three months, leaving merits open.
Directions to the respondent to decide the representation in accordance with law within three months; merits left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.11732 of 2008
MADHURI KUMARI
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
-----------
2 27.01.2009 This matter has been listed out of turn on a motion slip filed that the petitioner did not wish to argue the matter on merit but wanted an order simpliciter for disposal of his representation.
When the case is called out learned Counsel for the petitioner reiterates that he does not press the writ application on merit but only seeks appropriate orders for disposal of his representation at Annexure 5 by respondent no. 2
In view of the limited prayer made this writ application is disposed with directions to the concerned respondent to decide the representation in accordance with law within a maximum period of three months from the date of receipt and/or presentation of a copy of this order.
It is made clear that this Court has not gone into merits of the matter which shall remain open for consideration by the concerned respondent in his discretion, in its entirety.
Snkumar/-
(Navin Sinha,J.)
Madhuri Kumari
The State of Bihar
Navin Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court