Writ petition dismissed after counsel, on instructions, stated the petitioner did not intend to pursue it and would explore his remedy before an appropriate forum; the court left the petitioner free to approach the appropriate authority.
None; liberty given to petitioner to approach the appropriate authority and exhaust his remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9788 of 2026
Pradeep Kumar Agrawal
…. Petitioner
Mr. A. Behera, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Sanjay Rath, AGA
CORAM:
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND
Order No.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER 14.05.2026
(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman) Judge
MRS/Laxmikant
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: SENIOR STENOGRAPHER Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 15-May-2026 11:24:43
Page 1 of 1
Pradeep Kumar Agrawal
State of Odisha
Harish Tandon
Murahari Sri Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
