Disposed¶4

Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Braja Bihar, Kalahandi v. Ito, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur

Orissa HC16 Apr 2026WP(C)/6163/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Orissa High Court, Cuttack; W.P.(C) No. 6163 of 2026; order dated 16.04.2026; Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Kalahandi versus ITO, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur and another (Opposite Party No.2: Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)); income tax exemption matter; pending stay application before CIT (Exemption); Rule Nisi prayer; withdrawal memo by advocate Prakash Kumar Jena; petition infructuous; leave to withdraw granted; disposed of as withdrawn; coram: Chief Justice and Justice Murahari Sri Raman; no statute or precedent cited; no monetary award.

What did the court decide?

None beyond leave to withdraw; the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn (counsel's memo stated it had become infructuous). No substantive relief, direction or quantum resulted from this order. ¶4

Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Braja Bihar, Kalahandi Vs Ito, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur — Orissa HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No. 6163 of 2026

¶3

Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Kalahandi

¶4

…. Petitioner

¶5

Mr. Prakash Kumar Jena, Advocate -versus-

¶6

…. ITO, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur Opposite Parties and another

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND

¶9

HON’BLE MR JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN

ORDER

Order No.

16.04.2026

1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner

¶14

with the following prayer:

¶15

“Under the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the petitioner prays the Hon’ble Court to kindly consider the aforementioned facts and be pleased to:

¶16

(I) admit the writ petition;

¶17

(II) issue RULE NISI calling upon the Opp. Parties to show cause, and if they fail to show cause or show insufficient cause, issue appropriate writ, direction and order commanding the Opp. Party No.2 to take up the

¶18

Page 1 of 2

¶19

stay application pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) Opp. Party No.2;

¶20

(III) pass such other or further order(s) or such direction(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice.

¶21

And for this act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.”

¶22

2. Mr. Prakash Kumar Jena, learned counsel appearing on

¶23

behalf of the petitioner files a memo in the Court today stating therein that the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition as the same has become infructuous in the meantime. The said memo is taken on record.

¶24

3. Leave is granted.

¶25

4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

¶26

(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally SignedSigned by: SUMANTA BEHERA (M.S. Raman) Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Judge Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 17-Apr-2026 13:00:24

¶29

(M.S. Raman)

¶30

S. Behera

¶31

Page 2 of 2

Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Braja Bihar, Kalahandi v. Ito, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saraswati Sishu Mandir, Braja Bihar, Kalahandi v. Ito, Exemption Ward, Sambalpur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S1 Security Services India Private Limited.,Bhubaneswar Vs State of Odisha

Bikash Sahoo Vs State of Odisha

Srujeet Khuntia Vs State of Odisha

M/S. Shovan Steel Product, Bargarh Vs the Commissioner Commercial Tax (C.T) and Goods and Services Tax (G.S.T), Cuttack

M/S Civic Constructions (I) Private Ltd., Chandrasekharpur, Khorda Vs the Comnr of Commercial Taxes and Gst, Odisha, Cuttack

Rajesh Kumar Kar Vs Additional Commissioner(Appeals), Cgst, Central Excise and Customs, Bhubaneswar