Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to approach appropriate authority. The court, noting the respondents' no objection, disposed of the petition as withdrawn and vacated the interim order.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 580 of 2022 ODHC010013462022
Haresh Kumar Agrawal
Petitioner
Mr. Subham Agrawal, Advocate -versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. Biswabara Dash, Additional Standing Counsel Mr. Upendra Kumar Samal, Senior Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE CHITTARANJAN DASH
ORDER
Order No.
09.09.2026
1. Mr. Subham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioner has filed a memo stating therein that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with a liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redressal of his grievance.
2. Ms. Biswabara Dash, learned Additional Standing Counsel (ASC) and Mr .Upendra Kumar Samal appearing on behalf of the opposite parties submit that they have no objection, if the petitioner
is permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition.
Page 1 of 2
3. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of
as withdrawn. The interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
(Harish Tandon) Chief Justice
(Chittaranjan Dash) Judge
S. Behera
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SUMANTA BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 10-Sep-2026 13:25:48
Page 2 of 2
Haresh Kumar Agrawal
State of Odisha
State of Odisha and others
Harish Tandon
Chittaranjan Dash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
