Rabindra Kumar Sahoo v. State of Odisha
Case brief
What is this about?
RACP benefits; MACP; RACP 3rd increment; Finance Department resolution dated 06.02.2013; pre-taken over period; w.e.f. receiving of grant; entire period of service; District Education Officer Nayagarh; D.E.O.; Competent Authority; fresh representation; speaking and reasoned order; Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Orissa; O.A. No.1668 of 2017; Odisha Administrative Tribunal; disposed of on 09.10.2018; W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020; SLP(C) No.15573 of 2020; disposed of on 04.01.2021; engaged in service 04.05.1998; High Court of Orissa at Cuttack; Aditya Kumar Mohapatra; merits not expressed; representation direction.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation (with all grounds and supporting documents) before Opposite Party No.3, District Education Officer, Nayagarh, within three weeks; Opposite Party No.3 to consider and dispose of it in accordance with law, taking note of the ratio in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra's case, by a speaking and reasoned order within eight weeks, with the decision to be communicated to the Petitioner within a week thereafter. No substantive RACP/MACP benefit granted by this Court; merits expressly left open.