Disposed

Prativa Ray v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC11 Sept 2026WP(C)/29601/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed seeking regularization of services for a Lecturer in Education. The High Court disposed of the petition at the admission stage, directing the Director of Higher Education to consider the petitioner's grievance and representation within three months.

What did the court decide?

The respondent Director of Higher Education directed to consider the petitioner's grievance and representation regarding service regularization within three months.

Prativa Ray Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2026)

¶1

Signature Not Verified

¶2

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:31

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.29601 of 2026 CNR NO: ODHC010706402026

¶4

Prativa Ray

¶5

…. Petitioner

¶6

Mr. Sangram Jena, Advocate

¶7

-versus-

¶8

State of Odisha and Others

¶9

…. Opposite Parties Mr. T.K.Dash, AGA

¶10

CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

11.09.2026

Order No.

Heard Mr. S. Jena, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. T.K.Dash, learned AGA for State-Opposite Parties.

¶16

It is submitted on behalf of the Petitioner, who is claiming regularization / approval of her service against the 1^st post of Lecturer in Education in Biren Mitra Memorial Women’s College, Thoriasahi in the district of Cuttack and release of salary components as per Grant-in-aid Order, 1994, that her claim is similar to the case of the Respondent in FAO No.509 of 2014, which has been disposed of by a Co-ordinate Bench on 19^th March 2025 and upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.

¶17

It is further prayed on behalf of the Petitioner that her representation under Annexure-5 may be considered by the appropriate authority.

¶18

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of contentions of the petitioner, with a direction to the Director of Higher

¶19

Signature Not Verified

¶20

S.Das

¶21

Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:31

¶22

Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar (Opposite Party No.2) to consider the grievance of the Petitioner as per her representation at Annexure5, in accordance with law, and keeping in view the decision aforesaid, if applicable, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.

¶23

An urgent certified copy of this order shall be issued on proper application.

¶24

( B.P. Routray)

¶25

Page 2 of 2

Prativa Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prativa Ray v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases