High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition without addressing merits, directing the Director of Higher Education to consider the petitioner's grievance per his representation within three months.
Representation submitted by the petitioner must be considered by the Director of Higher Education within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.29395 of 2026 CNR NO: ODHC010679402026
Chittaranjan Satapathy
…. Petitioner
Mr. Sangram Jena, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha, represented by its Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Higher Education Department and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. T.K. Dash, AGA
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 11.9.2026
Order No.
Signature Not Verified
S. Das
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:27
the grievance of the Petitioner as per his representation at Annexure-7, in accordance with law, and keeping in view the decision aforesaid, if applicable, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for regularization and salary release should be disposed of by directing the appropriate authority to consider the petitioner's representation.
Chittaranjan Satapathy
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
