This court disposed of a writ petition by Principal Secretary without deciding merits, directing the Director of Higher Education to consider the petitioner's grievance regarding salary components under the Grant-in-aid Order, 1994.
Direction to the Director of Higher Education, Odisha to consider the petitioner's grievance based on his representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.29392 of 2026 CNR NO: ODHC010702672026
Debendra Kumar Naik
…. Petitioner
Mr. M.K.Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and Others
…. Opposite Parties Ms. U. Padhi, ASC
CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER 11.09.2026
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:30
in accordance with law, and keeping in view the decision aforesaid, if applicable, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order along with a copy of the writ petition.
( B.P. Routray) Judge
S.Das
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Petitioner's claim for release of salary components is maintainable.
Whether the appropriate authority should consider the Petitioner's representation under Annexure-6.
Debendra Kumar Naik
State of Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
