Disposed

Amari Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC11 Sept 2026WP(C)/29327/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged eviction proceedings without notice despite having a Land Right Certificate. Court disposed of petition ordering Municipal Corporation to decide representation within eight weeks and staying eviction during that period.

What did the court decide?

Stayed eviction of petitioner pending Municipal Corporation's decision on petitioner's representation regarding lawful eviction.

Amari Sahoo Vs State of Odisha — Land Acquisition | Orissa HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29327 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010695932026

¶2

Amari Sahoo

¶3

Petitioner(s)

¶4

Mr. Subash Chandra Puspalaka,

¶5

Advocate

¶6

versus-

¶7

…. State of Odisha & Opposite Party(S) Ors. Mr. Sonak Mishra, ASC

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

¶10

ORDER

¶11

Order No. 11.09.2026

¶12

01.

¶13

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

¶14

2. Heard Mr. S.C. Puspalaka, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Sonak Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

¶15

3. The grievance of the Petitioner is that, though the Land Right Certificate to the extent of 484 sq. ft. over Plot No.43/263/9881 under Khata No.4689 of mouza-Bhubaneswar Unit-39 Gadakana vide the Certificate dated 26.12.2023 under Annexure-1 has been issued, but now the Opposite Parties without issuing any notice are proceeding for eviction of the Petitioner without giving her any opportunity of hearing.

¶16

4. Considering such limited of grievance of the Petitioner,

¶17

the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that in the

¶18

Signature Not Verifiedevent the Petitioner files a representation to the Digitally SignedSigned by: GITANJALI NAYAK Page 1 of 2

¶19

Digitally SignedSigned by: GITANJALI NAYAK Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:40:39

¶20

Gitanjali

¶21

Commissioner, Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation (Opposite Party No.3) highlighting her grievance within a period of fifteen days from today along with certified copy of this order and a copy of the writ petition, Opposite Party No.3 shall consider the same and take a decision, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks thereafter. Till such decision is taken by the Opposite Party No.3, the Petitioner may not be evicted from the case land.

¶22

5. The web copy of this order be treated as authenticated copy.

¶23

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

¶24

Signature Not Verified

¶25

Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:40:39

¶26

Page 2 of 2

Amari Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amari Sahoo v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases