In a writ petition seeking regularization of service as a Lecturer in Odia, the Court disposed of the matter at the admission stage without expressing an opinion on merits, directing the appropriate authority to consider the petitioner's representation within three months.
Direction to consider the petitioner's representation within three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:29
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.29256 of 2026
CNR No. ODHC010688132026
Subhransu Sekhar Sahoo …. Petitioner
-versus-
State of Odisha and Ors.
…. Opposite Parties
Ms. U.Padhi, ASC
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER
11.09.2026
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: SANGRAM DAS Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 12-Sep-2026 12:55:29
(B.P. Routray) Judge
S.Das
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim for regularization/approval of service can be considered by the appropriate authority in light of a coordinate bench decision.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
FAO No.509 of 2014Referred¶18
Subhransu Sekhar Sahoo
State of Odisha
Director of Higher Education, Odisha
B. P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
