Disposed

Nakula Ayal v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Sept 2026WP(C)/29188/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an eviction notice, directing the petitioner to seek the statutory appeal remedy under the O.P.L.E Act. It granted a stay on coercive action while the petitioner files the appeal and condonation petition. Case disposed.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner permitted to file appeal and condonation petition within 15 days; coercive action stayed till interim application is taken up; Writ Petition disposed.

Nakula Ayal Vs State of Odisha — Writ and Judicial Review | Orissa HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.29188 of 2026

¶3

CNR No. ODHC010687412026

¶4

Nakula Ayal

¶5

…. Petitioner(s)

¶6

Mr. Bibhu Prasad Chhualsingh, Adv.

¶7

versus-

¶8

…. State of Odisha & Ors. Opposite Party(s) Mr. Tej Kumar, ASC

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI

¶11

ORDER

¶12

Order No. 10.09.2026

¶13

01.

¶14

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.

¶15

2. In filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner alleged to be an encroacher has challenged the notice of eviction dated 04.08.2026 issued by the Additional Tahasildar, Similiguda vide Annexure-2.

¶16

3. Heard learned counsel for the Parties.

¶17

4. During course of hearing, learned counsel for the State, at the outset, submits that there is a clear statutory remedy of appeal available under the O.P.L.E Act against the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-2. Hence, the Petitioner should approach the Appellate Authority.

¶18

Signature Not Verified

¶19

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA 5. In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of O rissa Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:13:44 entertain the prayer made in this Writ Petition. However,

¶20

Page 1 of 2

¶21

considering the request of learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court permits the Petitioner to file an appeal along with a petition for condonation of delay, if any, so also a petition for interim protection before the concerned Appellate Authority as per the provision under the O.P.L.E Act, within a period of fifteen working days hence. In such event, the Appellate Authority shall conclude the hearing after providing adequate opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned within a period of three months from the date of filing of the appeal.

¶22

6. It is further directed that till the interim application to be filed by the Petitioner is taken up, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner pursuant to the impugned notice of eviction vide Annexure-2.

¶23

7. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶24

(Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge

¶25

Ayaskanta

¶26

Signature Not Verified

¶27

Digitally Signed Signed by: AYASKANTA JENA Designation: Personal Assistant Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of O rissa Date: 11-Sep-2026 13:13:44

¶28

Page 2 of 2

Nakula Ayal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nakula Ayal v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases