Disposed

Aparna Shg, Subarnapur v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Sept 2026WP(C)/28519/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an order excluding Women Self-Help Groups from paddy procurement and a writ of mandamus for their inclusion. The court granted liberty to file a fresh representation to the respondent and observed that the designated authority must decide on it within three months. The petition was then disposed of without further order.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file fresh representation; directive to opposite party to decide within three months of receipt; writ petition disposed of.

Aparna Shg, Subarnapur Vs State of Odisha — Service and Employment | Orissa HC (2026)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28519 of 2026 CNR No. ODHC010679882026

¶2

Aparna SHG, Subarnapur ..... Petitioner

¶3

Mr. S. K. Dalai, Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Odisha & Ors.

¶6

..... Opposite Parties Mr. S. P. Das, ASC

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER

¶9

10.09.2026

¶10

Order No. 01

¶11

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties.

¶13

Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:-

¶14

“In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the Petitioner most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

¶15

a. issue a writ in the nature of certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing Communication No.l3387/FS&CW dated 06.08.2026 issued by Opposite Party No.l, particularly paragraph 1 read with paragraph 3 thereof, to the extent that it omits or excludes Women Self-Help Groups from undertaking farmer registration and consequential paddyprocurement activities for KMS 2026-27;

¶16

b. issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to include and consider eligible WSHGs, including the Petitioner, for farmer registration and paddy-procurement activities for KMS 2026-27 in accordance with the guidelines dated 12.09.2019 and

¶17

Page 1 of 2.

¶18

13.09.2019 and the arrangement prevailing during KMS 2025-26;

¶19

c. direct the Opposite Parties to formulate and apply transparent, objective and non-discriminatory eligibility and performance criteria for the selection and engagement of procurement agencies, and to assess each WSHG individually instead of imposing a blanket exclusion upon the entire class;

¶20

pass such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of Justice, equity and fair play.

¶21

And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner, as in duty bound, shall ever pray.”

¶22

However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No.3 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence.

¶23

It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No.3 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No.3 be communicated to the Petitioner.

¶24

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶25

(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge

¶26

Jyoti/Utkalika

¶27

Signature Not Verified

¶28

Digitally Signed Signed by: UTKALIKA NAYAK Designation: Sr Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 11-Sep-2026 16:22:00

¶29

Page 2 of 2.

Aparna Shg, Subarnapur v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aparna Shg, Subarnapur v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases