The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition seeking revision of pay and pension under ORSP Rules, 2017. It directed the second opposite party to consider the petitioner's fresh representation along with documents within three months.
Liberty granted to make a fresh representation; respondent directed to decide within three months upon receipt.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 28393 of 2026 CNR No.ODHC010670402026
Srikanta Kumar Dhir ..... Petitioner Mr. S.K. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC Mr. S.K. Patra, Adv.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER
10.09.2026
Order No. 01
“Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to revise the pay of the petitioner in the pay level-9 of the pay matrix under ORSP Rules, 2017 as he was in receipt of the grade pay of Rs.4200/- in the 3rd RACP as it evident from the Government order dated 27.04.2026;
And further the Hon’ble Court be pleased to direct the Opp. Parties to refix the pay and pension of the petitioner in the enhance rate in the pay Level-9 under ORSP Rules, 2017 and to grant him the differential arrears, within a stipulated period as deem fit and peroper;
And/or pass any other appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and direction/directions in the fitness of the case;
Page 1 of 2.
And for this act of kindness as in duty bound the petitioner shall ever pray.”
(BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge
Jyoti
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: JYOTIPRAVA BHOL Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORI SSA Date: 11-Sep-2026 11:10:38
Page 2 of 2.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's prayer for revision of pay under ORSP Rules, 2017 is maintainable as a writ petition.
Whether the Respondent should be directed to reconsider the petitioner's claim after liberty is granted for fresh representation.
Srikanta Kumar Dhir
State of Odisha
Birajapranna Satpathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
