M/S. Suvam Power, Khorda v. Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Bhubaneswar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that with the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) now constituted and functional, the writ petition is not maintainable. The court directed the petitioner to deposit the mandatory tax, interest, and penalty amounts specified under Section 112(8) of the GST Act and file the appeal within the notified timeline.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed. The petitioner is directed to deposit the required tax, interest, and penalty under Section 112(8) of the GST Act and file the appeal before the GSTAT within the notif